Talk:History of Bermuda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs more content[edit]

This is still woefully short of material. Needing to be covered in detail are the years under the Somers Island Company, the growth of trade, the British military building boom after the Revolutionary War, etc. Then we get to the civil rights movement in Bermuda and the political changes of the 1960s. Etc, etc.... Noel (talk) 04:05, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Parish names[edit]

For St. George's, see Talk:St. George's, Bermuda. For Smith's, Smith's is the common form used by Bermudians when speaking (although I suppose one can't be sure if its "Smiths" or "Smith's" that is being said); however it is also given as "Smith's" in most books (e.g. Terry Tucker, Bermuda: Today and Yesterday, etc). Noel (talk) 02:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Possessives in Bermudian Place Names[edit]

The use of possessives in Bermudian place names is not only the tradition in Bermuda, but is grammatically correct. The Parish is the Parish of Smith, Smith being the person for whom it was named, hence, literally, Smith's Parish. The same is true of St. George's, which non-Bermudians are always trying to convert to St. George (though nobody ever writes St. David, curiously). The Town of St. George is St. George's Town, not St. George, himself, and the same is true of St. George's Island and St. George's Parish. Unfortunately, Bermudians have to contend not only with the habits of non-Bermudians, today, to re-name their places, but also must contend with the fact that most historical maps and texts dealing with Bermuda were produced by non-Bermudians, who often had never set foot on the islands (note Captain John Smith's General History of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles).

Aodhdubh 02:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Richard Sharples[edit]

Added in the link to the page on Richard Sharples along with a brief description of the assassination.--Vannin 01:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

natives[edit]

Is it right to assume that Bermuda was uninhabited prior to European discovery? --86.135.216.24 17:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, something should be in the article either way! If there were its a really bad attitude that they don't even warrant a mention 79.64.24.161 (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Indigineous Population[edit]

No, Bermuda had no population prior to its discovery by Spaniards around 1512. Despite numerous visits by passing vessels, and many seafarers being wrecked on (and subsequently being rescued, or affecting their escapes, from) the archipelago during the course of the following century, no attempt was made to settle the islands until the wreck of the Sea Venture, which began Bermuda's permanent and continuous settlement in 1609. Although often thought of as part of the Americas, Bermuda is an Atlantic archipelago, formed in the same way, on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, as other Atlantic islands (such as the Azores). Although the nearest land mass to it is North Carolina, Bermuda is quite remote from North America. Given that remoteness, the small size of the archipelago, the storminess of this part of the Atlantic, the level of Pre-Columbian North Americans' (the likeliest source of a hypothetical aboriginal population) seafaring technology, and the sophistication of their overwater navigational skills, the settlement of Bermuda by North American natives prior to European settlement would have been highly unlikely. In any case, there is no written or archaelogical record of any indigenous human population at any time prior to the arrival of Europeans.

Aodhdubh (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Um... okay. Don't you think we should at least mention that it was originally uninhabited SOMEWHERE in the article, rather than leave it to the reader to assume it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.172.155 (talk) 08:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"So-called slaves"?[edit]

This phrase is repeated over and over in the article, and I find it... odd.

Either these people were or were not slaves. If they were, then "so-called" should be removed. If they were not slaves, then they should not be referred to as slaves. 70.171.113.214 (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous peoples of North America[edit]

Since Bermuda was uninhabited prior to its discovery by Europeans, I am puzzled by the category placed in the article calling it an unassessed Indigenous peoples of North America article. Perhaps somone can explain, or else can remove the category. --DThomsen8 (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Bermuda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

por que o artigo em portugues diz que houveram guerras raciais nivel eua mas aqui nada diz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.211.74.156 (talk) 09:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]