User talk:Kgashok

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 01:42, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of G. Bakthavathsalam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on G. Bakthavathsalam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the pre-spam version, but this one still needs a lot of cleanup. There are awards listed which have no articles about them, in some cases from organizations which have no articles about them; the text is in list form rather than prose; etc. Most of the article is not sourced to reliable sources; and a lot of it is fluff and trivia.

Will power paradox[edit]

I think that maybe this addition to List of paradoxes might be notable, but really that list should point to articles or sections of articles and that way the notability is established. SO I'll leave it for a week or so but I think you need to try setting up at least a stub article on it with the link and see if it remains otherwise the entry in the list should go should go. Dmcq (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 I have created a stub at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Willpower_paradox, hopefully it will get accepted. 
 Kgashok (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on submitting an article to Wikipedia. Dmcq (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AlexGraal (talk) 22:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — ⊥ɥǝ Ǝɐɹʍıƃ ^(ʇɐlʞ) 20:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 05:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Hello! Kgashok, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower as a paradox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 23:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Willpower as a paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counselor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of paradoxes[edit]

Per my edit summary, you'll need to find and supply a reliable source. Someone tried to add that before, and couldn't find any sources other than the author himself. It's not up to me to go find sources to verify content you want to add, especially when I'm not convinced that the paradox is actually notable. Of course, if you found such sources, then it could be added. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blub paradox[edit]

Hello. You undid my revision, supposing it erroneous. Are you not confusing paradox with the allegation of a paradoxical behaviour in some. Even sticking to the dictionaries' simplist and classical "tenet contrary to received opinion", there remains to show where is that breach with received opinion. "Superior power of other languages" is not in itself bare a logical statement or proposition. --Askedonty (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KGiSL Institute of Information Management[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KGiSL Institute of Information Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 13:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower as a paradox concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower as a paradox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Willpower paradox[edit]

Hello Kgashok,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Willpower paradox for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mangesh Khairnar (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willpower paradox[edit]

The article Willpower paradox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was declined at AfC (see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower as a paradox), but the creator added it to mainspace anyway. Looking at the information and sources, it appears that only 1 source actually talks about a "willpower paradox". While the other sources are about "willpower", it's WP:OR to connect them to this idea of a paradox. As such, with only 1 source, this subject does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Willpower paradox[edit]

Hello Kgashok. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Willpower paradox.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower paradox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Willpower as a paradox[edit]

Hello Kgashok. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Willpower as a paradox.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willpower as a paradox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kgashok. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]