Talk:H. Reid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
B-Class criteria


  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Heidijane 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The quality assessment was shown as being a B-class article. While there are many books listed as references, they lack page numbers. Also there are no footnotes. Because of this deficiency, I am adjusting the rating to C-class. Senator2029 ‖ Talk 15:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

The new Wikipedia article about H. Reid has been posted. Please take time to read the article, and, if you care to, either improve it yourselves or let me know of any errors, suggestions, etc. The article could use a photo or 2 if anyone has an image in electronic format and permission to use it. I have had one offer, but that photo is not yet available, and I wanted to go ahead and get the initial story into Wikipedia. Of course, it is easy to make changes and add to existing articles. Anyone who would like to know more about H. Reid's impact is my life is respectfully refereed to User:Vaoverland in the section entitled, "a book that has impacted my life". I hope you enjoy the article. I intend to sit back and look back through some books which feature H. Reid's photography. Vaoverland 06:27, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)

middle name[edit]

Sources differ on his middle name. There is agreement that the correct letter was an "A", however. Vaoverland 21:25, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on H. Reid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]