Talk:Deschutes River Woods, Oregon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notable?[edit]

If it wasn't for the census information, I'd just list this entry on the Votes for Deletion list, & if no one spoke up have it deleted after 7 days. It's nothing more than a census tract with a few thousand people in it -- which is probably the case for any number for rural census tracts -- & not an identifiable community, incorporated or otherwise.

Unfortunately, I've noticed that there is a heated discussion at present over listing articles on VfD because of "lack of significance." Therefore, I'm contenting myself with this note. Discussion? -- llywrch 20:45, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deschutes River Woods, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]