Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Adventure 3

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 17:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Adventure 3[edit]

An unreleased game should not have a page of "speculations".

Delete. - Stoph 21:24, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
delete, keep if it actually exists. Unreleased stuff is acceptable, if it's major and anticipated, like Civilization 4. I couldn't find this on Gamespot or the official sega site, but I got 842 google hits and some official-looking sites.-LtNOWIS 02:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I checked GameSpot as well, and I couldn't find it. I don't think it's even been announced yet. - Stoph 03:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speculation, cruft. Megan1967 04:34, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Speculation. Nestea 21:58, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have been accused for making speculative articles b4. One of the most obscure video game speculation articles on VfD was Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/DOOM/DUNE. I don't know if Sonic Adventure 3 is speculation, but we should keep it for now and add the realism when we hear about it since it is superfluous to delete an article that will start a 2nd iteration of existance. --SuperDude 05:50, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a better idea. Delete this and wait for official facts to pop up. Nestea 22:23, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia =/= Crystal ball. Ketsy 19:52, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.