Wikipedia talk:Wikilove from the press

Wikipedia Project‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I really like the quote from one The Economist editorial - "the surprisingly good Wikipedia". But perhaps it is not glowing enough to appear here? Pcb21| Pete 07:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I found that quote in my search and I too felt there was a lack of kick in the comment. That's too bad, I wanted to have a comment from every single "influential" publication on this list. But I don't see how the Economist can not cover Wikipedia in a comprehensive article one day in their science/technology special editions. lots of issues | leave me a message 15:37, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links, links, links![edit]

All of these really ought to have external links proving that we didn't just make them all up. Not that I think you did, lotsofissues, but it does't look so good. I do like the comments, and the formatting, though. JesseW 21:56, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Almost everything was retrieved from subscription electronic databases. Likely most of these quotes have been placed into closed archives. lots of issues | leave me a message 22:55, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have dried up. - Xed 22:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikihate from the press[edit]

To be neutral we also need a page with criticism from the press. Mieciu K 03:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]