Talk:Northumberland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeNorthumberland was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 11, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Northumberland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Northumberland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of North East England[edit]

I am starting a discussion on sorting parts of the whole region at talk:North East England Chocolateediter (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parishes project[edit]

(Posting here rather than on project's talk as I'm not sure the new project is functioning) I have started a project for missing civil parishes at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Northumberland are:

And these exists as a redirect only but should have separate articles:

A total of 20, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (3)#Northumberland. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Businesses[edit]

I’ve moved information from North East England#Businesses to this article in Economy and industry. Chocolateediter (talk) 13:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]