User talk:G worroll

Hello,

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your edits to Nonjudicial punishment and found them to be very good. Thank you for editing the article. Your experience will at least better inform anyone visiting Wikipedia who is interested in the subject :-) In any case, please continue to contribute to the project. Your work is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Acegikmo1 04:58, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. I don't think I'd mind the experience so much if I was on the other side of it:) Thankfully I was able to bounce back... but anyways, I just recently got into this place, the potential power of an encyclopedia based on the collective knowledge of EVERYONE ON THE PLANET with web access is just astronomical.

Proposed deletion of Frankie Bones[edit]

The article Frankie Bones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, promotional, WP:Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frankie Bones for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frankie Bones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankie Bones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jonathanfu (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]