Talk:Center for Progressive Christianity

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

Someone linked 'Jack Good' to Jack Good the computer programmer. Not the same person. I agree this page is pretty biased, I'll try and updating it at somepoint, I'm also a new user and need to figure out how all of this stuff works. --R

I attempted to wikify this article, but it still seems biased.-Danaman5

I tried to do some simple formatting and linking. I am a new user so I'll watch others improve on my effforts and hopefully learn Nicholsr

Advert tag[edit]

This has been tagged for being written like an advertisement for ages, but there hasn't been any real discussion. I have attempted to make the language more neutral in the past. What specific sections still seem problematic, or can we remove the advert tag here? WeisheitSuchen (talk) 20:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eight Points[edit]

Would there be a fair use justification for quoting the Eight Points in the article verbatim? Mr Wave (Talk - Contribs) 19:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the legal aspects of that, but I see that others, including religioustolerance.org,[1] are using them verbatim. First Light (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really wondering now because even though they seem to be everywhere, there are three different versions of them

http://progressivechristianity.org/past-versions/ (past)

http://progressivechristianity.org/the-8-points/ (current)

This makes me wonder if quoting them is worth the fair use trouble or if it going to need still further context. Mr Wave (Talk - Contribs) 21:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Center for Progressive Christianity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]