Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanniloideae

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:52, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

Vanniloideae

Gibberish, mostly in Swedish anyway --Orelstrigo 22:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• wtf? Delete. - David Gerard 01:46, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Anyone speak swedish? We have a swedish wikipedia. If its a valid article it should be transwikied there. If it's just gibbberish, delete. DaveTheRed 04:06, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not because of content but because it claims to be copyrighted. - Mustafaa 07:50, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Looks like it was copy&pasted from a Swedish biology textbook. I don't know why it has parts in English and parts in Swedish, though. — JIP | Talk 05:41, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Vanilloideae? Fg2 08:02, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Vanilloideae was created by the same user as Vanniloideae, and it is not an encyclopedia article either. The latter seems unsalvageable, the former might serve as a basis for an actual article. - Mike Rosoft 13:33, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Either this has copyvio issues and should be handled as such, or it does not and should have gone to Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English rather than VfD. Content is clearly encyclopedic. And yes, if we keep it, it should eventually be merged to Vanilloideae -- Jmabel | Talk 08:33, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Content is clearly NOT encyclopedic. Text dump, delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:07, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.