Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captainovesen/Omary

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus, kept. -- Scott e^iπ 06:58, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

User:Captainovesen/Omary[edit]

Wikipedia is not for personal homepages or self-promotion. that's what this user's sub page is turning into. Kingturtle 21:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it s a Userfied page which was speedy deleted as a vanity article. Rick K 23:32, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
Keep - at least until an attempt is made to discuss the matter with the user - that might have come prior to a VfD --Doc Glasgow 23:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Prior to this VfD my interaction with this user involved banning the user for 24 hours because he uploaded a picture of a young girl with the comment anal sex and then placed the image on the anal sex article. Kingturtle 02:08, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment If the birth date on the article is accurate, the article poster is only 13 years old. That might explain some of the erratic behavior. Firebug 05:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - That sounds like grounds to delete regardless of this contents of the page--Doc Glasgow 02:18, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - I agree. Material such as that when placed in an article of content like that could reflect poorly on Wikipedia and can possibly be seen as condoning pedophilia. Luckily Shivian took care of it.--Lzygenius 08:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)-Lzygenius 08:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.