Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Aguilar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Julian Aguilar was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Complete text of the article is as follows: "Julian Aguilar was born on September 13th, 1986. His life has been full of interesting events so far. It's expected that he'll become the Emperor of Mexico, 10 years from now." Too bad none of these interesting events made it into the article to establish him as notable, except of course for the one that hasn't happened yet. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:31, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Come back in 10 years—Trevor Caira 03:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. --Viriditas | Talk 03:51, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, please don't come back in 10 years. Emperors generally do not make good editors. --fvw* 08:13, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
  • Delete. Weasel language, who is expecting it? Also non-verifiable. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 08:38, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Future history. Andris 08:44, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • I feel like this would be speedy under candidates 1 ("no meaningful content") and 4 (very short articles with no context). Delete. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 10:07, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. A good speedy ? Looks like. Gtabary 17:41, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I'll second that motion. Extreme, speedy and empirical delete. Agree with Fvw. How POV can an emperor be about himself, anyway? - Lucky 6.9 21:58, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as prank. Wyss 00:32, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. utcursch 07:27, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Jayjg 22:48, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or userfy. Alphax (talk) 04:27, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
    • "userfy". I like that; I'm going to start using it. -- Antaeus Feldspar 06:34, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. We don't accept "potential". netkinetic

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.