Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Stone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. ugen64 00:13, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Phillip Stone[edit]

Political self-promotion. From the edit summary I take it he is the one who posted, directly from [1] (else it is a copyvio). - Mailer Diablo 18:36, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Self-promotion, vanity autobiography written in first person. jni 18:44, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Copy of a political ad. hydnjo talk 19:16, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Delete. crappy article by someone who is not even a nominated candidate. Kevintoronto 20:54, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • More vanity. Delete. userfy. Tygar 23:57, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Please allow us to Delete this vanity rant. Wyss 00:54, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep but clean up. A vanity page? Yes, but this isn't some teenager. Stone appears to have actually contributed to society. --Ryan! | Talk 01:06, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Google for "phillip stone" + photographer gets about 70 hits, and "phillip stone" + quadra gets 2. Not notable even if it was cleaned up. DaveTheRed 03:34, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:31, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, appears to be a campaign biography. In any case, not notable. Ianking 06:04, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity, non notable. Oi vey. --Woohookitty 06:31, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. "his pending nomination as the Green Party candidate for the North Island riding in the May 2005 provincial election" - the peak of his accomplishments is a hopeful nomination to a minor party in a regional election? Vanity. Srcastic 06:41, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete--minor party nominees to small offices are not usually notable. Meelar (talk) 07:44, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn vanicruft. ComCat 02:16, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.