Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Rolland

Kimberly Rolland was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to speedy delete.

Kimberly Rolland

The page's entire contents are "Kimberly was a Godess known to live during the 5th century.". I'm unsure what this even means, and there are no relevant hits on google or my university library, so I'm leaning towards assuming this is made up. --Delirium 01:25, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

This sounds like it could be speedy deleted to me. Indrian 01:26, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

• I wouldn't have even bothered to google this. I think it's kinda funny that you did, to be honest. Mike H 01:48, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
• I have since deleted it. Mike H 01:49, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't think the name "Kimberly" was popular in the fifth century. Indeed, I don't think it was popular before the 1970s. And [1] and [2] seem to confirm this. I think that someone named Kimberly Rolland may have an admirer at IP address 141.209.34.211, however. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:54, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC) P.S. Agree this could be a speedy, under newbie test, patent nonsense, and very short articles with little or no context. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:54, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • A final remark: I think my sister Kimberly is pretty damn great, and she was born in 1969. :-o That has no point, but I had to share. Mike H 01:55, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
    • She was a trendsetter, obviously. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:05, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.