Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomfield Avenue

Bloomfield Avenue

It's not particularly "encyclopedic," but more importantly it is a Mr. Treason creation. According to the rules (as I understand them) all his edits are to be reverted, regardless of content. So that means deleting this page. If I've misinterpreted those rules, I apologize (but not to him) --Feitclub 03:45, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)

• If Treason's edits do have such a sanction, then why can't this article be speedied? Delete, regardless. Fire Star 05:08, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Interestingly enough, it does seem to be factual. I would agree, though, that in its present form it doesn't add much. Mackensen 05:36, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• It seems factual, maybe even useful to me. I'm not sure I see what the problem is. Why not let this one slide and keep it?meagermango
• Delete: If Mr. Treason is on hard ban, then he's on hard ban. However, this is just a usual kind of delete, IMO. The problem is that there are Bloomfield Avenues all over the place. What's said in this article is true. It's also of very local historical significance. The thing is that it's not of wider interest. Are the people in Orange going to have heard of the importance of Bloomfield Avenue, or are they going to have their very own street by that name? Geogre 13:09, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete if that's the custom. Banned user is banned user. --Improv 13:41, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• The page is not a Mr. Treason creation, although an IP credited to him did edit it. Edit history: [1] That said, the road doesn't appear to be notable. No vote yet. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:50, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)