User talk:63.147.240.11

Proposed deletion of Siegel Clyne

The article Siegel Clyne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks Notability, no references, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 21:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Siegel Clyne

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Siegel Clyne. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siegel Clyne (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Johnny 2x4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny 2x4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny 2x4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Tantive IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tantive IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tantive IV (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  15:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Tantive IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tantive IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tantive IV (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

"Ptolomaeus Crater" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ptolomaeus Crater. Since you had some involvement with the Ptolomaeus Crater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

---