Talk:MBDB

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about MBDB.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Cleaned[edit]

Folks lets please sound at least sound moderatly smart in drug articles. No reason to give the DEA fuel. I had to clean this article of all "yous" and other sentances addressing the reader. This is an encyclopedia not a how to guide.

Quote: "Just like with MDMA, if you must use the drug, it's best to make sure you're hydrated at all times and take occasional breaks from dancing or other strenuous activities. Dosage, according to PiHKAL, is 180-210 mg; the proper doasge relative to body mass seems unknown. A good starting dose for an inexperienced user is around the 150mg range. If the user has done MDMA before, then using the dose according to PiHKAL is a good starting dose."

This is just awful. In the future read better written pages like the one on mdma before editing. Second, for gods sake do not use slang. "If the user has done mdma"? Fuck. No one will take that serious. That was written poorly and does not contribute to the article so I have deleted it.

Foolishben 23:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

N-methyl analogue?[edit]

Isn't it unnecessary or improper to say "[MBDB] is the alpha-ethyl-N-methyl analog of MDMA (Esctasy)" when MDMA is already N-methylated. Perhaps it should be "...analogue of MDA" or the "N-methyl" should be removed. I'm going to remove the "N-methyl" portion but if I am mistaking please clarify. --Astavats (talk) 22:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does MDBD redirect here?[edit]

I'm going to remove the redirect from MDBD and flag it for deletion. Isn't it true that the correct abbreviation is MBDB? Klortho (talk) 01:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]