Talk:Chicken egg

from VfD:

All the sparse information on this page can already be found in egg (food). The page would be better served as a redirect, as I do not believe it can become encyclopedic on its own. There is only one other page that links to chicken egg, and it's a user page, not an article. --PJF ^(talk) 09:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Repeat article. I doubt there's any information that isn't on egg (food) but if there is, it should be transferred. --Randy 12:22, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't we have an article about the embryonic development of chickens? That should be at chicken egg in my opinion. There's lots more to chicken eggs than just eating them... [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: (There's getting them down from the roof, chasing them down when you need to behead them, and then the plucking.) Embryology can be discussed in the chicken article. I don't really think that this article title is a logical spot for the information, though it isn't awful. Regardless, that would require starting over anyway, so delete. Geogre 16:24, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep if expanded. Egg (food) doesn't cover the topic fully. Grue 17:31, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: DCEdwards1966 17:41, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 20:14, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Or redir to Chicken, which has plenty of room for a discussion on embryology--[[Chicken embryology]] can be broken-out later, if/when needed. Or, possibly make it a disamb page between Chicken and egg (food). Niteowlneils 20:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Chicken embryology. Good idea, Niteowlneils. But keep a disambig notice at the top. --Idont Havaname 23:48, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think you can "keep a disambig notice" on a redirect page. The redirect wouldn't work. Redirect to egg (food) for now because that's the most similar content. It can be moved to Embryology if/when someone has content to put there. Rossami (talk) 02:58, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I typed in "chicken egg" looking for information on the chicken egg paradox (which came first etc.). Perhaps the page could be expanded with information on that subject? Nick04 21:16, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Expand or redirect. Either way I see no reason for VfD. anthony 警告 23:53, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Which should we direct to, the chicken or the egg. I think clearly the chicken, as details of eggs specific to chicken eggs should be there, not in the article on eggs (and certainly not in egg (food)). In any case, I'm off to watch Ken lose. anthony 警告 23:58, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion