Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craven Destiny

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. The article cannot be deleted due to block-compression revisions. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Craven Destiny

• Delete Non-notable Article is in violation of Vanity page and it is intended to use Wikipedia as means for promotion of their statement. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. There exists nothing credible in any reference sources or media, newspapers, etc, noting the existence of this statement. Classicjupiter2 16:59, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. I really have no idea if this is notable or not; it does look like self-promotion, especially if you look at the article's talk page. These surrealists give me a headache. Classicjupiter2, this and your other VfD nomination are a little messed up format-wise. I think you need to put your signature (~~~~) inside the vfd line, like this: {{subst:vfd2 | pg=PageName | text=Reason ~~~~}} Also, do not put brackets around the page's name. If you're already doing that way, something else must be goofy... :o) Android79 18:17, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, Android79. I did follow all the edit instructions for creating VfD nominations and I am still having problems formatting the addition properly, even when I follow the instructions exact, I even have them printed out. I will take your advice on future VfD nominations. I see that you have a, "headache" over the "surrealists".Classicjupiter2 18:25, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• 57 Google hits, borderline advertising, non-notable, delete. RidG (talk) 18:10, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete even that modest number of Google hits are mostly Wikipedia mirrors or unrelated stuff. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:26, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic infighting among artsy pseudointellectuals. Comment: Looks like they have a foe in the VfD nominator. Comment: Even if this article is kept, the advertising and external link in the last sentence should be deleted. Barno 18:44, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, publicity, stealth ad. Wyss 01:19, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn adcruft. ComCat 02:07, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, advertisement. Megan1967 02:45, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unless evidence to the contrary is presented. 28 google hits for "Craven Destiny" without the word "Wikipedia", and many of those hits have nothing to do with the subject of the article. -- Infrogmation 21:18, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.