Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6th Magic Kingdom Novel

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 19:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

6th Magic Kingdom Novel

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, page is misnomer, all hits seem to link back to "us" therefore probably non-notable. Doesn't even give the REAL name of the book. Master Thief Garrett 00:04, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Note 1: Tried to Speedy it for no-content but Golbez removed the tag, saying "this has been on here for hours; apparently no one thinks it's delete-worthy, and no one wants to remove the notice. I will. Put it on vfd; maybe they have ideas." It was NOT my intention to drag this thru Vfd but it seems I have no choice. Master Thief Garrett 00:06, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete since we don't even know what the title will be... or anything else about it. RJFJR 01:09, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
• I'd say merge into Magic Kingdom (Terry Brooks), but it's already there. So delete. Bubamara 04:12, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Not likely that someone will search under that name anyway. --Fuzzball! (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - if there had been actual information, I would have voted merge instead - Andre Engels 09:07, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• With due respect to the author, is this factual or just a guess to get first-posting props ? Delete and keep deleting until there is some substance. --Simon Cursitor 07:43, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no info. --Marianocecowski 10:25, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.