Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gastrulation

I like this image by Pidalka44. It's simple, nice and clear. - Metju12 05:42, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nominate and support. First vote here - Metju12 05:42, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Object. I'm not sure whether the middle stage in the pic has a name. If it does it should be numbered too. If it doesn't I don't see the need to number the other two. I'll support if the numbers are removed. Mgm|^(talk) 10:13, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
Object -- odd numbering and caption makes the image a little confusing. - Longhair | Talk 03:47, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Doesn't show much for a diagram. Unclear and not very informative. Junes 10:03, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Its a well executed illustration, and I believe the numbered labeling is the recommended approach on Commons (to facilitate translations). Its just that it is a relatively simple diagram. -- Solipsist 07:51, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - nice shapes, but why not label the bits inside the image and do away with the numbers and external caption. - Ian 07:12, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted ed g2s • talk 11:06, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)