Talk:Loanwords in Japanese

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:07, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Untitled[edit]

This article was on votes for deletion, the consensus was to keep it. See the archived discussion for further details.

Hey, Kusunose, thanks for fixing my typos. That's what happens when I work too fast, I guess... --Marnen Laibow-Koser (talk) 01:46, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

http://www.sljfaq.org/afaq/arigatou.html points nowhere... [edit] Fixed. 162.40.216.140 21:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

word "doitsu" come from Dutch! not German! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.145.14 (talk) 14:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.61.6 (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. German "Deutsch" [dɔɪtʃ], which would have become J. "doitsi" (where the "ts" sounds like English "ch"). The Dutch word "Duits" [dœyts] is a better candidate for the etymon of "doitsu". So I'm going to tag that text. --Thnidu (talk) 05:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The term 'renji' has a long dash between 're' and 'nji', and therefor it would be better also to write the Roman characters 'Reinji' for the translation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.179.6 (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation AID?[edit]

Since when does gairaigo make pronunciation better? It tends to make it worse by confusing Japanese learners of English with regard to English phonetics, I would think. E.g., associating the kana ア with the letter "a", or "R"/"L" with らりるれろ. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.208.179.163 (talk) 10:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Work done by Frank Doulton and other linguists seems to show that it varies by age group, and by the task involved. For example, kids might make mistakes with pronunciation, but they're far better at understanding. His work also seems to point out that the older you are, the more likely that it might help you rather than hurt. 66.188.113.92 (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]