User talk:Szczels
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Finally, here are some open tasks:
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page![[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 21:14, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
Kennington Park[edit]
Thanks for that, Szczels. I take my hat off to you for putting so much effort into the article. Perhaps we should organise a South London wikimeet in said cafe? --Tagishsimon
- Thanks for the comments – about formatting – I've learnt the hard way not to leave spaces at the start of a line. About 'Enry: well, nearly met him: in the 70s my wife taught art at the Barclay School in Stevenage (with a Moore sculpture at the entrance) and we went with pupils on a prearranged visit to his studio, but didn't seem to be expected and our enquiry was passed to him to be loudly met with "who are these people?" in a rather lordly accent. Then we got shown round by an assistant which was fascinating: the place is now the Henry Moore Foundation museum, and is in Hertfordshire as I should have checked before editing, so will delete Essex. The reason for the initial edit was that he always seemed part of the art establishment rather than being presented as a "working class artist", but feel free to change it back if your info says otherwise, Best wishes with the project, --dave souza 00:50, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- how to differentiate text? I'm still learning, but would suggest italic text either using the I button above the edit area or typing ' twice before and after the text you want italiced, hope this helps, dave souza 23:33, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
He was 'presented as' an establishment artist – but this illustrates systemmic pressure for there not to be such a category as 'working class artist' which like 'working class intellectual' is a contradiction in terms. Szczels (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Liverpool Dockers[edit]
Hiya. It's not so much that the dockers page link is broke as that I assumed it existed and it doesn't. Yet. I'm working on it...... Chaikney 18:02, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Loopzilla Speaks[edit]
Why can't I email you from the user page?
Dunno mate LoopZilla 13:13:54, 2005-09-08 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:KP-Tinworth2.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:KP-Tinworth2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 05:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for File:KP-Tinworth.detail.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:KP-Tinworth.detail.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, we're heading in the right direction, but we still need you to add a license tag, such as {{GFDL}}. (Without it, the image keeps appearing on lists of untagged images, and people will keep bugging you about it. :-) ) Stan 03:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
OK thanks Szczels 21:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Kennington Cross[edit]
Hi Szczels! I like your Kennington Park article. I was just wondering, as you have the local knowledge, if you could tell me where exactly 'Kennington Cross' is/was and what it refers to...Chaplin refers to it in his autobiography but I can't find it on the map...(Also do you know where 'Pownall Terrace' was – also mentioned by Chaplin...)Colin4C 19:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Its the cross road of Kennington Rd and Kennington lane opposite the Doghouse pub. Haven't heard of Pownall Terrace. The Ordinance survey does print old maps of the area... Szczels 15:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Dinarphatak has added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Melanie de Salignac, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but
Dinarphatak doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — iridescent (talk to me!) 14:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The article The Unconquerable World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- essay based on non-notable book
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK. I've removed the deletion thingy with the following reasons given on the discussion page and here. This is not an essay it is a concise summary that sticks closely to the books structure. I'm not adverse to someone who has read the book making it more concise and I will do this within the next week or so if no-one else does. With regard to its notability – if you go to the Jonathan Schell page you will see that it was one of the few of his books that did not have a separate wikipedia page. The author is well known in the field as can be seen from the links on this page. – Szczels (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I am amazed! You have been contributing longer than I have but you have not learned some basics of Wikipedia articles. At the simplest level, your contibution omitted the words "is a book" and failed to link to the author's article. Look at the articles about Schell's other books and you will see that by Wikipedia standards, yours is an essay. As a minimum wou will: add the publisher and ISBN to the infobox and put the refs (properly formatted – with no naked URLs) into the article. Pull your finger out – Croydonians can do better than that. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Friendly request[edit]
Hey there. We're looking for reviewers on the sociology article to get it to good article status. Please review or provide advice if you have the time! --Tomsega (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Proletarian Nights : the workers dream in Nineteenth Century France has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book. No independent refs. No evidence of meeting WP:NBOOK.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Proletarian Nights : the workers dream in Nineteenth Century France for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proletarian Nights : the workers dream in Nineteenth Century France is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proletarian Nights : the workers dream in Nineteenth Century France until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Catchy Shubby Cricket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable form of cricket. A google search brings up no reliable sources, as the article stands, it is written like a POV littered advert. Fails WP:GNG and WP:V.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
My defence is that not all 'remarkable' forms of culture can be found by google search. Those that come from the oral realm are most likely to not be literalised on the web and so found by google. The people least likely to have their culture written are those who culture is mostly oral. These are mostly working class people and people of colour. We must look for oral references to confirm importance. That is why I have linked to a video – not made by me about Catchy Shubby as played in London. It is true that I have spoken with Tony Moody and this motivated my entry. Please see this video. I have removed the earlier link to the video made by myself. Szczels (talk) 11:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Catchy Shubby Cricket for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catchy Shubby Cricket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catchy Shubby Cricket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
January 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brixton Artists Collective may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [http://stefan-szczelkun.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/activating-brixton-art-gallery-1983-86.html
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Szczels. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi from MDR[edit]
Perhaps you would like to call by in January. I am generally at MDR on Wednesday afternoons. Fabian Tompsett (MDR) (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks Fabian I'll try todo that Szczels (talk)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Szczels. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Szczels. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:Naphtali2005.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal file. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Szczels,
- I saw your comment on the file talk page which I interpreted as contesting the proposed deletion so I have removed the PROD tag from the file. The image might still be nominated for deletion at WP:FFD but as of now, you don't have to worry about the file being deleted today. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)