Talk:1922 in Greece

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

independendent ionia[edit]

Didn't Greece claim Izmir and its hinterland, not to make it independent but to make it part of Greece? Wasn't joining Ionia to Greece part of Megali Idea, which was being persuaded by Greeks at this time? Honestly, I believe the answer is yes, but maybe I am wrong. However, if I am right does it not follow that the plan was Ionia to be part of Greece? Ato

Sure, annexation to Greece was the original plan. But when the military situation seemed to make this impossible, the independence plan was an attempt at a compromise to prevent Ionia from returning to Turkish control. --Wik 20:15, Apr 24, 2004 (UTC)
Maybe this should be stated in the article clearly. However, this very much sounds like a smokescreen. Do you have any proof that the Greek intention had actually changed, and they would be content with an independent Ionia? That this was not a precursor for eventual joining to Greece? IMHO, later events, both in Anatolia in following years and in Cyprus decades later, suggest that Megali Idea is still favored by Greeks. Ato
Well, one can only speculate about Greek intentions, and that can be left to the reader. --Wik 00:03, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)
OK, if you need to speculate, which one is closer to truth? Plan for independent Ionia, or its later joining with Greece? IMHO the one that is more likely, or both possibilities should be in the article.ato
No, the article doesn't need to speculate, it should just describe what the stated policy was. --Wik 03:08, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1922 in Greece. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]