Delete. Delete fast. Delete ruthlessly. (this has nothing to do with the bible-babble, but I can't stand it when people use "principal" when they mean "principle")Dukeofomnium 13:03, 28 May 2004 (UTC) As rewritten, keep Dukeofomnium 16:32, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Content appears to be about why Christianity is better than Plato. May be a class assignment. At a minimum, needs a change of title and lots of wikification. m.e. 13:04, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No amount of wikification can save this.--Bwmodular 14:58, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possible copyvio --- see sig at end. Platonic epistemology deserves an article, but I can't see anything here helpful to someone who wishes to write a real one. Smerdis of Tlön 15:11, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Possible copyvio, definite bible-babble and hopelessly POV. Reads like a Jack Chick comic gone bonkers. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 17:44, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Really looks more like a class assignment. Completely unreadable but no reason to bother wikifying it. POV. I would rather say the sig belongs to someone who wants to spread his propaganda. Lev 19:03, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I give it an F. Oops, I mean, delete. -- Matty j 23:00, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Should have been speedy deleted. RickK 19:31, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This ranks among the most idiosyncratic and tangled pieces of writing I have ever seen here. Denni 21:44, 29 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like copyright vio and wouldn't be encyclopoedic even if it weren't. The subject does deserve an article, but you can't get there from here. --Christofurio 01:22, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
