Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Creation

Language Creation was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Language Creation

I'm sure that this doesn't belong here.

It is quite interesting to read, but is not encyclopedic - perhaps it should be moved to Wikibooks.

Jeff Knaggs 17:36, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Agreed. DenisMoskowitz 18:21, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)

Me too. Edwinstearns 18:34, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete. There is already a conworlding book in wikibooks - Ingolemo 21:49, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete or transwiki. Wikipedia is not the place for how-tos or personal essays. 力伟|☺ 21:57, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I wrote this Page! How dare You!!!!! (D. de Weck)

Above is by User:62.252.0.5, article created by User:62.252.0.4.

Those IPs are both used by NTL in the UK, so unfortunately it's not appropriate to block this nuisance. Noisy | Talk 12:11, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Personal essay. Non-encyclopedic. --jpgordon{gab} 01:11, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. But this could make good h2g2 material with a little re-working. P Ingerson 03:55, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Interesting, but it's out of context here. Delete and/or transwiki. Also a prime Everything2 and Wikigeeks candidate. - Lucky 6.9 20:54, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. - and Block user who is a vandal. Jeff Knaggs 11:58, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Original research. Noisy | Talk 12:11, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.