Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fournier

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 16:11, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Fournier

Another article on Maltese nobility, from the same website as the others. I believe this shouldn't be voted upon, but follow the same decision as the other articles.

Hence, this page has been created: Wikipedia:Deletion_policy/Maltese_nobility. Please vote there instead of here, in an attempt to create consensus on this and half a dozen of related articles.

• Keep. Notable.--Centauri 12:12, 23 Feb 2005
• Keep all. Encyclopedic, verifiable. Obscure, but we're not about to run out of paper - David Gerard 21:24, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all per above. Kappa 22:45, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• (Author of the article in question) Radiant thats nice you let me know about having items copyrighted but to delete all of my work, well thats beyond the belt, dont you think, or are you rather pricky. If so, then delete all of my contributions and those thereafter which have been amended by others.
  • Ah, but it was done in the exact opposite order. First we came upon one of your articles, and debated whether we should delete it. Then we made a group debate about them. And then we decided to contact you about the copyright issue. Radiant! 12:07, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.