User talk:Cavalorn

Welcome

Fun, isn't it? - David Gerard 20:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Welcome again!

Glad you've showed up. -- Smerdis of Tlön 19:49, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Couldn't hold out any more. Too much of the stupid.Cavalorn 17:15, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It's all Adrien's fault!

Velkome, oh Bringer of Scary Mutilated Koala's.

-Veratien 23:43, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Great work

I'm impressed... It's great to see someone so obviously knowledgeable and able to communicate that knowledge effectively. Thanks for being here -- sannse (talk) 15:00, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wow! Thank you very much! -- Cavalorn 17:16, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

re: choronzon

I'm not following this stuff anymore, man. Wikipedia is, like, one thing that somebody could do on a vacant evening. You want to rewrite all the articles on this topic, being all rigidly doctrinaire, go ahead. Auto movil 16:34, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

I'm not being rigidly doctrinaire at all - just now I included your original article, on the 'he said - she said' basis that we both agreed would work. I don't really understand where you're coming from here. One moment you say it looks really good, the next you're claiming I'm being rigid. For the record, what I'm not prepared to accept is *anyone* being rigidly doctrinarian, whether it's your take on the 'so called Abyss' (as you put it) or AC's original account. What you don't seem to grok is that you are trying to push a doctrine of your own, in which you state that AC was wrong and things aren't how he described them. BOTH accounts needed to go in there, in chronological order, and now they have.Cavalorn 17:04, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

It's not a doctrine of my own; it's what fan-boys would call 'secret teachings.' That said, maybe I shouldn't be going on about such things in a public forum, but the whole Crowley thing is actually incredibly simple. I don't see any reason to continue the tradition of being obscure about all this stuff.

Thanks for reworking the article. As I said, I can't follow this stuff too closely, but I'm certainly willing to bicker and discuss Auto movil 20:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Charmer

You're the only author on this article, is there any chance we can squeeze some 'earliest date of reference' or solid dates, locations and possibly references from you on this most interesting topic? 211.30.80.121 00:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cavalorn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cavalorn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salamanders in folklore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)