Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11:11

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 01:25, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

11:11

Not explanatory, pointless, no need in an encyclopedia.-72.20.132.7

Comment: User:72.20.132.7 put the VfD header on the page but never listed it on the VfD page. I am adding it here, this is not a vote. RickK 21:00, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for obvious reasons. Should have been speedily deleted. — JIP | Talk 21:01, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep it isn't brilliant at the moment, but I think it has potential. There are 25,700,000 hits on google for 11:11, although I expect most are nothing to do with this, the first page mostly is. I think it has the potential to become a good article, with an explanation of why this happens.--John 21:16, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Pointless, even as numerology goes. -- Egil 21:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this article is totally p o i n t l e s s. Unless Kappa says its a keep. Then I'm confused. As always Yours truly, Feydey 22:16, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete GeeZee 23:00, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete patent nonsense Stancel 23:18, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, John is correct. This is notable nonsense discussed by notable Uri Geller [1] and other possibly notable websites. Also the name of a horror movie [2]. Possible merge with numerology, although that's quite long. I added some external links. Kappa 23:32, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect to a suitable logical fallacy. --Carnildo 23:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's logical enough for that kind of redirect Kappa 00:09, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup to cover the movie, with a note about the phenomenon. I have the same experience with 3:14 and 12:34. Gazpacho 02:46, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "People who are having the so-called 11:11 experience see 11:11 on digital clocks everywhere." Or maybe it's just eleven minutes after eleven and they are nitwits. CDThieme 04:25, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, bordering on trivial nonsense. Megan1967 04:32, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Not even amusing enough for BJAODN Gmaxwell 05:28, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, though I have had a similar experience, only with the time 10:47. Perhaps I should start that article.....EvilPhoenix 06:48, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. People looking at clocks at 11:11 are likely to see the numbers 11:11 on them. If the movie is notable then maybe an article could be written on that. Separate issue, though. -R. fiend 21:08, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.