Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adminisphere

Adminisphere Articles for deletion/Adminisphere was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

A dicdef for a neologism. Gets ~1,600 Google hits, but still, is it encyclopedic? Mindspillage 22:07, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete & send to Wiktionary to let them decide if they want it. The term is certainly in use. It's either Dilbert-derived or Dilbert-inspired, and it has gotten a fair amount of play. Were it perfect it still wouldn't be here, of course. Geogre 01:17, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete; not encyclopedic. As an aside, do obscure neologisms really belong in the Wiktionary? I'm new there (even more so than here) and I don't know there is a VfD system in place to weed out nonsense words. --Ardonik 03:24, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • If that's the case, just delete it. It's slang, and it's getting usage, but I would want to force this on Wiktionary, which sounds like what we'd be doing. Geogre 21:12, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete slang neologism dicdef. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:15, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.