Talk:Suez Crisis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Suggestion for one of the missing citations[edit]

I would suggest using the following citation for the aftermath section of this article: Yaqub, Salim. Containing Arab Nationalism: The Eisenhower Doctrine and the Middle East. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.

ATTN: Someone with editing priveledges.

User:DrSangChi (talk) 12:14PM, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add another link...[edit]

There is no link for People's Republic of China. [I can not do this, although i have hundreds of edits to various Wikipedia pages.]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 February 2024[edit]

Section 8.5 (Aftermath - France) -

Change "The Suez crisis thus help to set the stage for the military disillusionment with the Fourth Republic, which was to lead to the collapse of the republic in 1958."

to

"The Suez crisis thus helped to set the stage for the military disillusionment with the Fourth Republic, which was to lead to the collapse of the republic in 1958." Skylinehead (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 00:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1869 - "financed by the French and Egyptian governments?"[edit]

According to the article, the construction of the Suez Canal was "financed by the French and Egyptian government". The Canal was open in 1869, and Egypt gained its independent 1922. Hence, there was no "Egyptian government" that could fund the construction of the canal in the mid-18th-centry. I'm proposing to change that to "financed by France". Rroy2006 (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt was nominally independent in 1869. Actually it might have been technically an Ottoman province, but in real life it had its own government that could issue bonds I believe. Herostratus (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update source 117[edit]

Source 117 should be updated to include:
|author-link=Peter Goodwin
|date=2017
|orig-date=2005
Like so:[1] JackTheSecond (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Goodwin, Peter (2017) [2005]. "Low Conspiracy? – Government interference in the BBC1". Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. 2 (1): 96–118. doi:10.16997/wpcc.10. ISSN 1744-6708.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 April 2024[edit]

Change that the British bought the 44% shares in the Suez company for 4 million pounds (401 million pounds in 2021 money) to (£579 million pounds in 2024) ProfessorEthan (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: This number is calculated automatically by a template which uses the latest available inflation index. The number will update automatically when data for more recent years becomes available. Jamedeus (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, is there an extra "not" in this passage?[edit]

We've got A second round of secret diplomacy by Anderson in February 1956 was equally unsuccessful. Nasser sometimes suggested during his talks with Anderson that he was interested in peace with Israel if only the Americans would supply him with unlimited quantities of military and economic aid. In case of Israeli acceptance to the Palestinian right of return and to Egypt annexing the southern half of Israel, Egypt would not accept a peace settlement.

  1. Is that "not" supposed to be there in the last sentence? Doesn't make sense. What are we trying to say here?
  2. Unlimited? Did he really ask that? Or just something like "massive"?

Herostratus (talk) 12:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]