Talk:The Real Thing (Faith No More album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Legacy section[edit]

3 Korn quotes??? Places undue emphasis on one band that was influenced, would benefit from a diversity of perspectives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.220.144.149 (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

Ack! How could I have forgotten the play? I read that; it was funny stuff. Koyaanis Qatsi 22:49, 8 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Real Thing (Faith No More album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Real Thing (Faith No More album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Real Thing (Faith No More album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre summarization[edit]

These two edits, by two different IPs, are demonstrable of a failure to understand how Wikipedia articles should be curated: 12:21, December 24, 2022–21:32, December 24, 2022 and 03:29, December 25, 2022–06:17, December 25, 2022. The lead section and infobox serve as summaries of the article content, and if the IPs took the time to read the article as it stood before the aforementioned edits with deference to WP:DUEWEIGHT and WP:SUMMARY, they might appreciate that the infobox stated properly only those genres most good sources agree upon, where those sources' claims are covered in the article content, and the lead was doing the same. Genres less commonly mentioned by sources may be mentioned in the article content (which they were), with due weight, but not featured as a summary of the genre of the album in the lead or infobox. This is common knowledge for any editor who knows what they're doing, and constantly reverting work to fix the failure to follow these guidelines is practically vandalism, not in small part since the recent edit summaries clearly outline these guidelines as applicable. It may also be prudent for the IPs to read the sources more carefully too. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 08:46, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This issue has turned shamefully into an unreasonable edit war and as such I have reported it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 21:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]