This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Criticisms of historical accuracy and allegations of pro-Israel propaganda[edit]
I recall reading a report during 1999 in one of the British broadsheets (memory says "The Times" of London) which carried the film had generated criticism among Arab anti-Israel quarters who called out the way the involvement of Jews as slaves was written into the building of the still standing Sphinx and Pyramids of Ghiza, and seemed to accuse the Jewish Spielberg of making a film that was pro- the present day Israeli state. (The reporter commented that these criticisms were being made in the Arab media despite the Egyptians of the time being neither Arabs nor Muslims.) This is not mentioned. That could have be mentioned in this article, unfortunately I didn't keep a copy of the report. The article is silent on this, although it does mention the ban imposed in Muslim-majority states.Cloptonson (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to find a reliable source and include the information. pillowcrow 00:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Information on Katzenberg's resignation not verified by citation[edit]
Under #Development, the article states that "Eisner turned it down in order to keep in line with Disney's neutral stance towards religion. This became one of the many reasons for Katzenberg's growing friction with Eisner and the Disney board of directors, eventually leading to his resignation from the company." The citation attached to this claim does not provide evidence for it, and in fact does not even mention Michael Eisner or his secularist policy at all. I feel as though another source should be cited here. 159.2.146.30 (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
_01.svg){kind=small}
