User talk:NeoJustin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please be a bit more careful. :-) Rjd0060 (talk) 01:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Never mind. I completely misread. I need to be a bit more careful. :-) - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. Do you use Huggle? NeoJustin (Talk page) 01:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have in the past. I missed that IP user re-inserting the content and thought perhaps you reverted my edit by mistake. Sorry about that and keep up the good work. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I had a question about it since I've been using it for a couple of days but I'll just look it up. Thanks. NeoJustin (Talk page) 01:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For reverting vandalism on my user talk page...[edit]

oops![edit]

I made a mistake in reverting your edit! I totally screwed up! Sorry!:D

and I really like your little fake message thingy. Can I copy it?

Thanks! Saebjorn! 01:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. Sure you can take the fake message thingy. I took it from someone else's page yesterday. NeoJustin (Talk page) 01:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, sorry about adding the CSD template to your most recent article, but I'm quite frankly surprised that an experienced editor would add an article about a political organization without at least 2 reliable sources, which would not include the organization's own website. If you have additional sources, please add them to the talk page ASAP to avoid the article suffering deletion. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 06:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, please do not remove CSD tags from articles you create yourself. Instead, place the "hangon" template below the CSD template, until an administrative decision is made.

Also, I saw your sources, and am willing to give you a pass, but next time, it's probably better to not introduce articles into Mainspace without your sources being part of the article. If you haven't used it before, the Sandbox WP:SAND works great for getting an article ready to go. Best regards on your future edits. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 06:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...I removed it.Abce2|This isnot a test 06:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, would you like some help on the article?Abce2|This isnot a test 06:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was just going to put down that I didn't remove the tag. Sure you can help. NeoJustin (Talk page) 06:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the edit conflicts... it was hard to see who did what until the dust settled. Apologies for the warning to Justin. ;o) --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 06:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is tommarro okay? It's late down in the central time zone.Abce2|This isnot a test 06:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I'm going to add some stuff to it now but you can add whatever tomorrow. NeoJustin (Talk page) 06:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Glad that I can be able to help, or is it the other way around? Abce2|This isnot a test 06:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it the other way around? You're helping me.... or Wikipedia (If it's alive). :) NeoJustin (Talk page) 06:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I meant is it, "To be able to help, I am glad." Or would that be Yoda?Abce2|This isnot a test 06:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think "To be able to help, I am glad." is Yoda. NeoJustin (Talk page) 06:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? I just said that.Abce2|This isnot a test 06:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You said it with a question mark. I was agreeing with you. NeoJustin (Talk page) 06:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copy Edit needed: Howdy, when you get a chance, take a look at the 2nd sentence... I'm not sure what this is supposed to say, but it looks like the sentence wasn't finished, and makes no sense. We should probably fix it so users understand what the group is talking about. ;o) --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 06:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Dude... the 2nd sentence on this article... I'd fix it, but I really don't know what it is you were trying to say. The bill... ?? --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 00:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Err...I'm ready when you are. Abce2|This isnot a test 04:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Now is fine. NeoJustin (Talk page) 04:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I revamped sentence two. If it's not what you were going for, let me know. Regards, Javért 04:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did a bit of a tweak on it myself as well. Political articles like this have to be precise. Cheers! --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 07:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma Union Public Schools[edit]

I'm sorry, but are you sure that 64.136.164.35's information is correct? I've been keeping an eye on him and have been seeing that he's in the past made a lot of invalid entries. Such as this one here. [1] I know that there was not a New St. Elsewhere and it's always been just St. Elsewhere. I can assure you that I mean no harm to articles. --98.230.163.246 (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I checked some of the information listed and it looks correct. I'm adding a citation needed to the parts he added. I deleted the surrounding schools part since none of them are articles and I'm unsure how close they are to Oklahoma Union Public Schools. Thank you for your note. NeoJustin (Talk page) 00:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. --98.230.163.246 (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Protect Marriage Washington, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protect Marriage Washington. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. He Died For Your Evil Sins (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday[edit]

Hey, NeoJustin. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
-- Vatsan34 (talk) 04:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]


ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Icthus[edit]

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus[edit]

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi NeoJustin! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity[edit]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]