Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Gregory Palmer

Colin Gregory Palmer was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Colin Gregory Palmer

Voting myself for deletion. I made this page before I really understood all about Wikipedia. Don't want to go against the social norms and draw wrath from established users. : )

Thanks very much! I've gone ahead and deleted this. Good luck, and I hope you keep contributing. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 15:19, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

• Absolutely. In fact, I was trying to say the same thing at the same time as Meelar. By all means, please feel free to sign up...it's free, after all...and transfer the info to your new user page. This site is a ball! - Lucky 6.9 15:22, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This vanity page has reappeard. As far as I can see, it must have been deleted in Jun 2004, but recreated in Dec 2004. I sent an email to the user (User:CGP) earlier this week but did not receive any response. Otherwise, I think that all the above still apply. Uh, or is there something I'm missing? --Tbackstr 15:03, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

Delete - Not sure why it's back, but it was obvious vanity then, needs to go away permanent like until Colin can demonstrate encyclopedia-level noteworthiness. DreamGuy 15:51, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Wyss 16:48, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete again. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:44, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• del Mikkalai 02:30, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• I've speedy-deleted; if we deleted last time, there is no reason to keep now. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:46, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.