Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clydebank F.C.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep, and cleanup the temp stub. Joyous 04:07, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
Clydebank F.C.[edit]
This page is clearly written from a particular perspective, is about one brief moment in the club's history and is a personal essay. Smoddy | Talk 00:25, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup: This page appears to be a two year old press release by the UCS, so obviously can't remain as it stands. However, the team do deserve an article, especially after what happened a couple of years ago. Hopefully this VfD nomination and a Cleanup notice will inspire someone to write an article on the team. Rje 01:06, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Megan1967 01:08, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup: agree with Rje. --Boothy443 01:11, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup, this article is unacceptable as is... PoV, ad, limited context etc. Wyss 01:25, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- This is clearly a copyvio, and I have reported it as such. - Vague | Rant 07:58, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup --Is Mise le Méas, Irishpunktom 10:46, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
- /Temp written. --rbrwr± 14:11, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup I'm suprised there isn't a proper article on the history of this football club already.
- Keep the new stub, delete the old copyvio a.s.a.p. Kappa 21:07, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup - as a football fan, I would like nice articles on all of England's 92 football league clubs, as well as those of the top divisions in Scotland.
- Keep. Same reasons as Kappa's. Carioca 00:29, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.