Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Fucka

Uncle Fucka

How quickly can this vandalism be removed? Timberline 10:09, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It was a 110% speedy delete candidate - better use {{delete}} instead of vfd. andy 10:25, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• andy - thanks for the advice - I'll know next time! Timberline 17:59, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• I speedied it before I realized it was listed here. Content was a redirect to the red link Asses of Fire--couldn't think of anything it should redir to, so... Niteowlneils 20:45, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, perhaps? —tregoweth 23:20, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
• It looks like vandalism, but actually it's a notable song from the south park movie which deserves an article or at least a redirect to a description somewhere.Kappa 00:04, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• The content was nothing by lyrics, which is copyrighted and can't be kept regardless. Unless somebody wants to write an article, there's no point in creating the article just to make it a redirect. Delete. RickK 00:23, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
• Comment. I restored it since there is apparently some potential to redir somewhere. Niteowlneils 00:27, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Great. So you undeleted an article which is nothing but a redirect to a nonexistent article, and thereby reverted a deletion of a copyright violation. I have redeleted it. If somebody wants to create a NEW article with some cotent and no copyright violation in the history, please do so. RickK 00:57, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to the South Park movie article. (FYI, Asses of Fire was the movie-within-a-movie in which the song of this name appeared.) -Sean Curtin 01:47, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
• This should redirect to the South Park movie. [[User:Lachatdelarue|Lachatdelarue (talk)]] 18:48, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Individual songs are only rarely notable, and this isn't enough. --Improv 15:06, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)