Talk:Adelaide Street Circuit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Was Riccardo Patrese, not Ayrton Senna, who "ran behind waved furiously around the circuit to inform the stewards that the conditions were too wet to race." I'll take the liberty to corrige this text.

Adelaide Street Circuit in Video Games[edit]

Is this sort of trivia, especially as part of it seems to promote hack edits, really appropriate? And what on earth is super_alonso? I'm really tempted to delete this section, can someone justify as to why it should not? --Falcadore (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think super__alonso is the person who created the beta version of the old track (but I've removed that bit anyway). I don't have any particular objection to the section being removed but I note that numerous other circuit articles have similar sections, e.g. Monaco, Silverstone, Fuji, so you may care to raise the topic at WT:MOTOR. DH85868993 (talk) 00:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
super_Alonso being a internet identity of some sort should be deleted surely, but if there is etensive precedent in other articles... --Falcadore (talk) 01:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Performance Cars Lap Record[edit]

The Performance Cars lap record set by Chris Alajajian in a Subaru Impreza WRX STi on 19 March 2005 has been incorrectly shown as a Production Cars lap record. I propose to correct this on the table. GTHO (talk) 02:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As stated previously: Performance cars run to Production car regulations. Is this a table of lap records for individual series now? Do we now have to have lap records for each individual production car class? --Falcadore (talk) 03:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
According to the CAMS regulations for the 2005 Australian Production Car Championship "Vehicles must comply with the Group 3E – Series Production Cars rules". No such ruling appears in the CAMS regulations for the 2005 Australian Performance Car Championship. Different cars, different rules, different name, different championship, different Category Manager. I don't really mind if this lap record is on the list or not, but if it is it should be correctly labelled and it should link to a relevant page. GTHO (talk) 09:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So the same series will be eligible for two different records?
I'll repeat my earlier question though, is this a table of category records or series records? --Falcadore (talk) 11:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well the heading says "Class" but the table includes a "Dunlop V8 Supercar Series" record so it's hard to say. What I can say is that I have a Mallala program which lists Tim Leahey as the holder of the "GT Performance" lap record in a Volkswagen Golf R32, set on 19/09/04. A separate lap record for Production Cars is also listed. GTHO (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since Performance Car series was merged back into Production Cars in the late 2000s, and for around half of its existance operated from the same rulebook, is the any real reason to to seperate two or three years of racing from over 25? It's a little pedantic isn't it? --Falcadore (talk) 03:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tables[edit]

Please stop adding increasing obscure tables of statistics. This is not what wikipedia is about. --Falcadore (talk) 02:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adelaide Street Circuit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]