Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggridants
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 15:05, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Aggridants[edit]
Phycological neoligism for a dominant individual, no reason given for the significance of this term or the theoretical context that it is used in--nixie 02:56, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Wiktionary candidate?--ZayZayEM 03:51, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Wiktionary. Megan1967 04:49, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- But it makes no sense without some theoretical context, it'd be just as odd in wiktionary as it is in wikipedia--nixie 05:30, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge to Abraham Maslow
and delete. Tygar 06:17, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)- WP:GVFD#Incompatible_votes. Which do you actually want, deletion or merger? Uncle G 09:41, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
- Hah... whoops. Thanks :) Tygar 09:48, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
- WP:GVFD#Incompatible_votes. Which do you actually want, deletion or merger? Uncle G 09:41, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
- Merge to Abraham Maslow and redirect. If (unexpectedly) this got to be more than a paragraph or so, then it would be time to spin it back out. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:38, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
Merge not significant enough in its own right SusanaeIII
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.