Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lions and tigers and bears

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 01:57, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Lions and tigers and bears[edit]

Non-notable group, no links in, no releases, nothing, zip, nada. Feydey 20:21, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Wizard of Oz. -Sean Curtin 00:25, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 02:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Wizard of Oz. --Spinboy 03:56, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my! - Nunh-huh 03:56, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC. Redirect to The Wizard of Oz, in part, to avoid re-creation. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:58, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article, and your little dog too!, then recreate as redirect as noted above, because the phrase is so widely used as to be a somewhat likely search phrase. Barno 14:30, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
definitely REDIRECT to Wiz of Oz. Kingturtle 06:23, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, you know where, which is why. --Silversmith 19:27, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Follow the yellow brick redirect. --Death phoenix 03:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.