Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Klawans

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:30, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Michelle Klawans

Vanity, or a rude friend Denni☯ 03:16, 2005 May 20 (UTC)

• Delete. Some friend. NatusRoma 06:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Friendship is a wonderful thing, don't you think? Jamyskis 09:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Tribute page. Geogre 11:14, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Pure vanity, even if it is second hand.Donovan Ravenhull 11:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
  • No matter what, I still don't see how this is noteworthy, despite what Brookshawn has said. Donovan Ravenhull 10:59, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious attack page or rude prank at best. Uppland 13:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Author mis-spelled windshield. -- BD2412 ^talk 18:44, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
  • I vote that this reason be added to the list of valid reasons for deletion! Looks encyclopaedic to me Delete with all prejudice. Grutness...wha? 00:46, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep.This is a legitimate page and not an attack nor a prank. To my knowledge, all statements made on this page are true. Even the tampon decoration. Brookshawn 20:29, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • May I also mention that this page is favored by the person who it is written about, and has not been made as a means of making fun of. More information can be added to make it more meaty, which i have been doing before it was marked for deletion. Thanks

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.