Talk:Evaluation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Early comments[edit]

Why does Reputation redirect to this page? They're not the same thing at all... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordoni (talk • contribs) 12:03, 9 June 2004

The External Links seem to be in no special order. If so, then perhaps they should be listed alphabetically? (Rick Davies) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.21.233 (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2006

Evaluation methods[edit]

Anyone who has a particular interest in research/evaluation methods and methodology, there is currently a huge duplication between the Category:Research methods and Category:Evaluation methods. Please see the discussion on Category_talk:Research methods and add your opinion. JenLouise 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I advise Wikipedia administrators to take note that there is a vast difference between the evaluation methods listed here and research methods because evaluation, as a professional discipline, has not taken a clear path between objectivist vs postmodern methods and seeks to take both into account in the Evaluation Standards of 2011. As such, program evaluation has evolved into its own, admittedly somewhat emergent and perhaps awkward discipline, and as such should not be merged with other disciplines as the article's content would become meaningless for evaluators and a waste of its current added-value. The current article is certainly perfectible, as it quotes a meager variety of sources, but its academic content is of surprisingly high level for a Wiki article.

E. Bouchard, MPA, BA 2012-11-13 Former Quebec Evaluation Society administrator board member (until 2012-10-12). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.213.192.126 (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definition (first line of article)[edit]

The first line reads

"Evaluation" is a systematic, continuous and comprehensive process of determining the growth and progress of the pupil towards objectives or values of the curriculum.

This is too narrow. Evaluation in education is perhaps the most obvious, but the broadest theoretical outlines treat it in relation to the "six Ps": "program, personnel, performance, policy, proposal, and product" [1]. I will therefore employ just the second paragraph as an adequate definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.236.18 (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

autopsy!{by Cabdiraxman Mixile}[edit]

an autospy? and then weird brackets {}

Whats this good for?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.48.231.247 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2011

Re this edit: I googled that name thinking it was a hoax, but I found a management presentation by a person of Somali origin (in ordinary English letters, Abdirahman Mihile; compare the name Cabdiraxmaan Axmed Cali). Autopsy (not autospy) is also a real word, which in context was related to summative evaluation. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

evalution true?[edit]

evaluation is not true because their is no proof of what happened in their eyes. the Bible tells the truth not some scientist that thinks he can tell how old a skulls age is just because of a super computer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.124.224.52 (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may be looking for Evolution theory. Cheers! CharlieEchoTango (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki standards and bare URLs[edit]

I have reviewed a large portion of the article in relation to more general copyediting, but do not have expertise in this area, so it would definitely benefit from a knowledgeable look-over.--Soulparadox 09:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evaluation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091015044732/http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/ to http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evaluation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120429201744/http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp to http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

اريد تنزيل لعبه بيس لأنني احبها جدا جدا[edit]

اريد تنزيل لعبه بيس لأنني احبها جدا جدا جدا جدا 37.238.31.19 (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]