Talk:Mechanism (technology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Examples[edit]

should we add more links or examples of mechanisms? but how whould we do thaat with todays economy im just being literal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.235.33.2 (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Looking at these two articles they currently appear to be discussing the same thing from slightly different approaches, but as both of them are short, I think this could be be better done as one article as the starting description is more or less the same in both. Firebladed (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems sensible. I think Mechanism (technology) should be merged into Mechanism (engineering). "Technology" as a qualifier is too broad. Nurg (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Nurg. Since this discussion has a far too long time without new arguments, I will assume it concluded and I will merge Mechanism (technology) to Mechanism (engineering) now. --Rudolf Hellmuth (talk) 08:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]