Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sister Imelda D'Agostino

Sister Imelda D'Agostino

Although she appears to be a good person, she is a non-notable elementary school teacher. -- JamesTeterenko 02:35, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Comment The entire section Sister_Imelda_D'Agostino#Holy_Childhood_Association is a copyvio from [1]. But the rest is probably OK. What do I do about this? Mark the whole article as a copyvio because eventually it will have to be deleted to purge the copyvio from the history? I think that's what I'd better do. VfD discussants should review [2] this revision]. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:05, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Comment There's weird stuff in the edit history. Most of the edits are by two anons in the 24.24 range. The presence of comments such as "Buca Di Beppo: Very popular with Imelda is wine night at Buca on Wednesdays. Congratulations" and "Controversy has arisen over Imelda's true intentions in life. In her youth, she classified herself as a 'hellion' that was sent away to the convent. Also in question are her computer skills and game time during office hours." And what's with that "Congratulations Imelda, or should we say Anne?" I wonder whether this is some kind of prank and/or newbie test? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:15, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: It could well be. There is a real Catholic nun by that name who is on faculty at Mount Saint Mary's Colleges and part of the US Board of Bishops outreach. However, this may well be a schoolroom fake-out, or just a schoolroom collaboration. Let the whole article go through the copyvio page, where the author(s) will need to clear and confirm, and therefore get in touch. If they're pranksters, they won't follow through. Geogre 05:05, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Recently vandalized by another anon in the same IP range as those who created it. This one by 24.24.172.64. Vandalized content was: "Eivdently this evil woman is full of conflict and cheats/". [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:04, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)