Talk:Sex industry

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2014; 2017; 2019; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sex industry article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Business C‑class Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography C‑class High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work C‑class High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as High-importance).

Women in Business C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 September 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Exoticgiraffe, Fletchal.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sdesilva11. Peer reviewers: Axelman03, Sgraney.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

representations of Black Women in Porn[edit]

I went and reworded Black Women in porn I will be adding more information. I was trying to rework an earlier submission that got taken out. I hope this accepted thanks!(DiaEdie (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiaEdie (talk • contribs) 22:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an American peculiarity, limited to relatively small parts of the world. Focusing in 2021 on the skin colour of a client or sex worker comes across as racist.78.16.51.157 (talk) 11:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sexist?[edit]

Hello I want to ask one question. Why it says "making their bodies an object that MEN can buy for a price". This expression is sexist unless this is quote from book writer. Because women can also pay for prostitution and objectify other women, so it seems wrong that only men are mentioned as objectifying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.26.211.1 (talk • contribs) September 30, 2021‎ 16:38, (UTC)

Merger proposal[edit]

There is a clear consensus to not merge the two articles. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 15:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose merging Sex work into Sex industry. There is too much overlap between the articles since the topics are hardly different words. Content that is in one article and missing in the other would still fit in the article it was missing in. Thus, adding them together would just get a richer article and less people missing one article or the other. JustBeCool (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree (1) Currently, your proposal is a bit vague; which sections of the articles overlap? What issues would be better in one over the other? (2) There's already hatnotes on both pages. Why not add wikilinks to both pages in the hatnotes? (3) Even if there is overlap, I think both articles cover separately notable topics; one covers issues regarding what sex work is, how it's regulated, and how commenters have reacted to it. The other article discusses the sex industry more broadly.

Maybe asking for expert help on some relevant noticeboards would be helpful. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:09, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I think both articles cover separately notable topics; one covers issues regarding what sex work is" Whatever was mentioned to what sex work is such as pornography, stripping etc can be and has been covered in both articles. "One covers,...how it is regulated" How it is regulated is covered in the sex work article but not in the sex industry article but that is only because no one has added it yet as it is only appropriate that regulation of the sex industry should be mentioned in an article on sex industry. "One covers,...how commenters have reacted to it" As you can see in both articles, how commenters have reacted to it is covered in both articles. "The other article discusses the sex industry more broadly" What is something more broad about it in sex industry that cannot also be included in the sex work article? "What issues would be better in one over the other?" Exactly, it is not shown how one issue is better in one over the other. JustBeCool (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Whilst there is some overlap between the two, the topics are sufficiently different, as noted by voorts above, to justify an article for each --John B123 (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose i agree with the arguments made above in opposition to this merger. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sex work is a subset of the sex industry as in mention in the sex industry article, but sex work is a subject that is notible enough to have its own article. Issues is sex work are not the same as issues in the sex industry and the merger of the two will prevent those notible issues from being properly discuss . Demt1298 (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per @Voorts

Elttaruuu (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As industry[edit]

The merge proposal with sex work failed so it would be best to more clearly differentiate the two articles. There were only vague points made in how the topics are different, so I looked to other similar comparisons, like healthcare and healthcare industry. As the short description for healthcare industry says it is the 'economic sector focused on health', it would help to make this article about the industry aspect and shift the other content to the sex work article. JustBeCool (talk) 18:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]