Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jick

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 05:07, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

Jick[edit]

Vanity advert, doesn't quite meet Speedy Deletion criteria. --Goobergunch|? 21:32, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete vanity/advertising. Rje 21:54, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Obvious delete. Ливай | ☺ 22:20, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Sure it does. Link platform, bad-faith, silly vandalism... Speedy Delete Wyss 03:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not a CSD. --fvw * 17:07, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
Delete one way or another. Just so long as this goes away. IMO, this is a speedy since it doesn't seem to be much more than a placeholder or Google-bomber, but I can wait. - Lucky 6.9 22:17, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete: Not vanity, just someone who plays the game. (Though they didn't even put in a link to the game's article.) Still, any biography should go under "Jick's" real name. Raven42 13:13, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete: I'm with Raven42 that it is a KoL user, not vanity. The KoL page has a red link to Jick's real name if someone wants to write a real article about him. --Elijah 19:48, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
Strong Keep. The creator of a very notable web-game. I'm working on it - please reconsider your votes. Grue 19:59, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity/ad. Jayjg | (Talk) 18:20, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.