User talk:Shakeer
Creating new stubs[edit]
The pemberton stub is useful for the Indonesian project - please note project tags on talk page - the main crit is the lack of extra refs (ie WP:RS or publications details of on the subject of java - however as a start the main art is ok - please help by creating articles with more than one ref - thanks SatuSuro 23:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Brian T. Edwards[edit]
A tag has been placed on Brian T. Edwards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of John Pemberton (anthropologist)[edit]
A tag has been placed on John Pemberton (anthropologist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of John Pemberton (anthropologist)[edit]
I have nominated John Pemberton (anthropologist), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Pemberton (anthropologist). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rschen7754 (T C) 21:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Huh?[edit]
Process? what the hell is going on? - thanks for the warning - cheers SatuSuro 00:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC) It would be a good idea to remember to sign your mail SatuSuro 00:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Please note that the article needs work for the culturaly confined (sic) and the deletors are none the wiser re his significance in the Javanese studies area - it needs more refs - the deletion and deletion review eds havent a clue about Indonesia or Java it is obvious- they need to be fed WP:RS SatuSuro 02:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Please help in expanding or checking the article in any way that might improve it - as afd scrutiny is not very forgiving of shortfalls of details - thanks SatuSuro 12:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Shakeer[edit]
Donot blank out the discussion page. Also donot forget to sign. Thinkloose (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Dilip P. Gaonkar[edit]
I have nominated Dilip P. Gaonkar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilip P. Gaonkar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. A new name 2008 (talk) 02:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Brian T. Edwards and others[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Brian T. Edwards, Dilip P. Gaonkar. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian T. Edwards for Brian T. Edwards, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilip P. Gaonkar (2nd nomination) for Dilip P. Gaonkar. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Allen Feldman[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Allen Feldman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303855149_ARCHIVES_OF_THE_INSENSIBLE_OF_WAR_PHOTOPOLITICS_AND_DEAD_MEMORY_The_University_of_Chicago_Press_2015. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 19:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kyeong-Hee Choi for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyeong-Hee Choi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.