Talk:colorForth

Untitled[edit]

If Esoteric programming languages really are "designed as a proof of concept, or as jokes, and not with the intention of being adopted for real-world programming", then Color Forth isn't one. PML.

You're correct. ColorForth is definitely not an esoteric programming language according to Wikipedia's current definition of the term. I've moved it to the main programming languages category, as a rightful Forth dialect. — danakil 08:14, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)

Does anybody else keep trying to click the word 'color', thinking it's a link to a nonexistent wiki page? Veinor (ヴエノル) 22:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Color[edit]

I've removed the coloring on the name "colorForth". See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(trademarks) for my justification of this. Although colorForth would not appear to be a trademark and color is not mentioned explicitly, the general principles would appear to apply. fraggle 16:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ColorForth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040131054056/http://www.colorforth.com:80/ to http://www.colorforth.com
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050901105808/http://www.inventio.co.uk:80/cfdos.htm to http://www.inventio.co.uk/cfdos.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ColorForth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]