Talk:Viola sonata

Untitled

There are numerous violin and viola duos from the Classical era, the best known being Mozart's K423 and 424 pair, around which the legend was, that Michael Haydn in ill health could not complete a set of six such duos he was writing for Bishop Hieronymus Colloredo*, and Colloredo still demanding the works from Haydn - perhaps believing the illness faked - Mozart stepped in (so the legend goes; this was doubted early last century if not earlier for several reasons, for instance that no such set of six duos was published under Haydn's name- but might be confirmed or denied by more recent scholarship) and completed the set for him.

However, this sort of thing might better go, on a string duo page.

*a major force in Mozart's life one way or another, usually described as other, that is to say, negatively...

A request, not for a new page but for within pages, would be some commentary on the balances between instruments on various pages (e.g. on cello sonata, what sort of trouble does - to choose the most common pairing - pairing cello and piano cause? Is the complaint against Brahms' first sonata valid, and why?) This is the sort of thing an instrumentalist, I'd say, can write a deal better than I can, together just perhaps with a theorist of sound ;). I used to play viola but that doesn't signify.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Viola sonata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070117175424/http://www.sjbsoloviola.com:80/SJB%20SoloViola%20Rep.html to http://www.sjbsoloviola.com/SJB%20SoloViola%20Rep.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060629064553/http://www.stringsmagazine.com:80/issues/strings88/Reviews.shtml to http://www.stringsmagazine.com/issues/strings88/Reviews.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050912001740/http://hem.fyristorg.com:80/m.bengt.andersson/english.htm to http://hem.fyristorg.com/m.bengt.andersson/english.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060630061734/http://www.cebedem.be:80/composers/legley_vic/en.html to http://www.cebedem.be/composers/legley_vic/en.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070524055132/http://www.nyvs.org:80/events/past/200506season.html to http://www.nyvs.org/events/past/200506season.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)