Talk:Glossary of the Weimar Republic

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corrected spelling of "Hindenburg" and changed first year of "Reichswehr"-entry, as the Reichswehr got its name in 1921.

To Gzorenplatz, why did you remove the Beamte and Angestellte names from the glossary? I think they should belong to the glossary. WHEELER 20:18, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Beamte/Angestellte[edit]

I* didn't remove them, but I think they are not specific enough for a glossary of the Weimar Republic.

"Inheritance"...[edit]

...is unimportant for the Weimar REPUBLIC

just gay

2007-02-6 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]